I bought it, flashed it to my ecu today and got some interesting logs
My first log run, I noticed that th IAM was already at 16, this is where it is set in the map. I went out did a few runs got home to check the data, looked at the min, max values before turning the car off and noticed that the IAM was down to 12 from 16. I also noticed that there was a -5 min value in the knock correction with a max of 15. I'm very concerned that there was some serious knock. I am running 93 oct. on this 91 oct. map.
I later found out that the blasted logging didn't work for some reason on the first run. I also noticed that my AFR did not get any richer than 12.0/1 with the XPT map.
Temp today was 75F, humidity about 65% I'm in Florida so pretty much at sea level.
I've attached the second run and one of my Cobb 93 oct stg 2 logs from a recent track event at Sebring.
Just comparing the logs it appears that the Cobb map is much better overall than the XPT map.
Some review and feedback from you guys would be greatly appreciated.
The mods on the car are as follows, TXS turboback exhaust, snorkle delete, K&N filter, P&P throttle body, gutted stock uppipe.
Additional info, the Cobb run was a 25 minute track session. The XPT run was a 3rd gear pull.
The car is used mostly for tracking.
Thanks for the input,
Don
PS I had to change the file extension to XLS since csv files aren't allowed attachments. Youcan probably change the file back to a csv after you download it to view it in ecuexplorer.
