prana wrote:yes that sounds like a good sensor, was hoping to get away with just the sensor rather than the converter with it to save some $. nevermind

Without a controller the only think you can tell from most O2 sensors is rather you are rich or lean of 'stoich' (14.7:1). This sort of narrow band sensing is useful if you are just trying to keep the vehicle closed loop at 14.7:1 for emissions, but pretty useless if you are trying to tune or log.
Both our LC-1 and LM-1 wideband controllers have two analog outputs, which can be independantly programmed to simulate other types of controller outputs (including narrowband). So you could potentially feed one to the ECU and one to a data logger.
Both units also have a serial output for sampled data in digital format. With both publish the serial protocols and offer a free SDK to help other logging/tuning software developers integrate this serial output into their applications.
As a side note, I think you mean 'AFR', not lambda. Lambda is a fuel independant method of measuring the stoichiometric ratio. You can convert to AFR by using the proper fuel multiplier. For example, stoich in lambda is always 1.0. 1.0 x 14.7 = 14.7, the AFR we normally associate with the stoichmetric ratio for automative fuel.
In lambda, theoretical 'best power' is typically around .85-.86, stoich (again) is 1.0 and 'best economy' is around 1.05. Best Power is often not sustainable, especially with turbo, so mixture is often richer (say .74-.75 lambda). But an AFR in the 9.something range would be an AFR of about .61 - .65 in lambda, which sounds awfully rich to me.
Joe Fitzpatrick
Innovate Motorsports