Thankfully RR, ScoobyRom, and others are actually open source despite the lack of "open" in their name. Perhaps I started some time ago
Ecuflash future developpement ?
Moderator: Freon
17 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: Ecuflash future developpement ?
by Merp » Thu May 17, 2012 4:56 pm
I agree, although I'd say its more disappointing than upsetting.. but that's just semantics
Thankfully RR, ScoobyRom, and others are actually open source despite the lack of "open" in their name. Perhaps I started some time ago
Thankfully RR, ScoobyRom, and others are actually open source despite the lack of "open" in their name. Perhaps I started some time ago
- Merp
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:23 pm
Re: Ecuflash future developpement ?
by Wiretap » Thu May 17, 2012 10:46 pm
The differing levels of activity in the forums say it all.
RR: Constantly people online, maybe 15-20 active topics per day.
'Open'ECU.org: 1-2 people online whenever I check. 1-5 active topics per week.
RR: Constantly people online, maybe 15-20 active topics per day.
'Open'ECU.org: 1-2 people online whenever I check. 1-5 active topics per week.
- Wiretap
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 8:03 pm
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
17 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest