epifan wrote:JRSCCivic98 wrote:You have to pay because he's a money hungry Russian.
Why are you not attack to EVO4MAD or Colby (he also take some profit from Tactrix cables)??? I can give you many examples of functionless diagnostic (tuning) software which have same cost or more expensive.JRSCCivic98 wrote:I personally wouldn't have a problem paying if it included defs for all ECUs out there.
I'm not selling XML defsJRSCCivic98 wrote:fuch you!!!
perhaps this is not permissible on the forum? Where is moderator???JRSCCivic98 wrote:Not only that, but we're all beta testing this software for him and reporting errors for him to fix as needed. The god damn thing should be free.... just like all the other programs on here. Cuz this is OPENEcu.org... not PAYEcu.org!
dude, I give 75% discount to you if you shut up
OK, asking me why I don't get mad at Colby for charging for a cable that he makes is stupid. That is a piece of hardware that is needed. It's also COMPLETE, which your software is not (cuz it doesn't have defs in it). Also, coming to a board which tries to distribute FREE software and beta testing yours while you decompile it (yeah, I said it...) and then turning around and charging for it goes completely against what this board is about.
I have to say, I can't help but see the vast similarities between ecuEdit and another software package out there.... makes me wonder if that's not the major reason why you're not including defs in the software. Make it incomplete and then you might be able to argue that it's not a working piece of software... hummm.