Hi guys,
I just noticed someting a little weird... it seems the Load vs RPM lambda bias table is either not taken under consideration from the ecu or doesn't work the way it' s intended.
I'm trying to accomplish a nice economy mode while still having lots of power by biasing the AFR in some load/RPM mode to get economy on the highway.... but what ever I put for bias above zero doesn't seem to be modifying AFR.. only number below zero seem to affect it.
Anyone else noticed this?
Tables with no effect??
Moderator: Freon
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Tables with no effect??
by m3n0ch3 » Wed Sep 06, 2006 8:22 am
- m3n0ch3
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 11:46 am
by swifty » Fri Sep 08, 2006 1:51 am
I haven't changed that table, but I have changed the closed loop cruise afr and this does make a difference to the afr on cruise.
If you change this though be careful because I believe it has an impact on afr corrections and fuel learning that has a knock on effect in open loop. ie if you lean this out a bit then open loop fuelling may also be leaned out.
If you change this though be careful because I believe it has an impact on afr corrections and fuel learning that has a knock on effect in open loop. ie if you lean this out a bit then open loop fuelling may also be leaned out.
- swifty
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 3:01 am
- Location: Behind a keyboard
by m3n0ch3 » Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:17 am
hmmmm unless I am wrong, in open loop, the ecu is not trying to reach cruise AFR but runs richer...
I set it to 15.3 and my open loop runs are still showing a nice lambda of 0.76 untill 6800 which is my boost decresing limit for now
I set it to 15.3 and my open loop runs are still showing a nice lambda of 0.76 untill 6800 which is my boost decresing limit for now
- m3n0ch3
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 11:46 am
by xswrex » Fri Sep 08, 2006 10:11 pm
swifty wrote:I haven't changed that table, but I have changed the closed loop cruise afr and this does make a difference to the afr on cruise.
If you change this though be careful because I believe it has an impact on afr corrections and fuel learning that has a knock on effect in open loop. ie if you lean this out a bit then open loop fuelling may also be leaned out.
The bias tables are referenced in the disassembly, i haven't tracked it down yet to see when they are used.
The closed loop cruise AFR works fine. I have verified it in my ROM (A4SE900D). The resulting RAM value is a word @ 209DE
- xswrex
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 3:50 am
by ride5000 » Thu Sep 14, 2006 6:08 am
i set my closed loop afrs before i attacked the open loop table.
however, since a different closed loop afr does not change the fuel trims i do not see how it should have an effect on the open loop afrs.
fwiw my target closed loop is 15.5:1, and my target higest load afr is 11:1
however, since a different closed loop afr does not change the fuel trims i do not see how it should have an effect on the open loop afrs.
fwiw my target closed loop is 15.5:1, and my target higest load afr is 11:1
- ride5000
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 12:18 pm
- Location: lincoln, ri
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests