EVO 9 ECU Image-Is there something wrong ? (Euro Spec Evo9)

EVO 9 ECU Image-Is there something wrong ? (Euro Spec Evo9)

Postby msoysal » Thu May 25, 2006 1:25 am

I wanted to compare Euro spec cars and US spec cars since there is a difference in terms of torque figures. However, I couldn't get data displayed properly. The RPM figures and Load values are not right, also the VVT data. I tried second time to upload the data. Results were same. Can someone help me. Thanks.

:shock:
Attachments
read image_34mhs37.hex
(512 KiB) Downloaded 772 times
msoysal
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 1:35 pm
Location: ISTANBUL

Postby S54fan » Thu May 25, 2006 4:36 am

I think this is a new ROM on this board? JM8884 shows nothing on search.

What exact Euro model is it off?

The ROM looks of similar structure to my JM8857.

I think your VVT map is at from pattern recongntion: &H69DF, 16 bytes per row, shows up nicely in ECUedit hex editor.
S54fan
 
Posts: 233
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 4:39 am

Evo 9 from Istanbul

Postby msoysal » Thu May 25, 2006 5:24 am

I bought my car in Istanbul, Turkey on Jan 2006 (probably December 2005-built in Japan) and it is a Evo 9 (there is only one model available here in Turkey, i.e EVO 9) with 6 speed,billstein suspension and electronic A/C. (285bhp and 355 NM torque due to Euro-4 Emission Standarts)

As far as I could look at the ignition and fuel maps I can tell that when comparing to your US ECU data, the car runs much more rich and retarded. This might be the reason for 50 Nm difference of torque. Other than that I wasn't able to see any meaningfull boost and VVC values. Maybe someone could help? Thanks.
msoysal
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 1:35 pm
Location: ISTANBUL

Postby evo400 » Tue Jul 18, 2006 1:01 pm

Something work if you use this


<rom>
<romid>
<xmlid>88840016</xmlid>
<internalidaddress>f52</internalidaddress>
<internalidhex>88840013</internalidhex>
<caseid>ECU</caseid>
<ecuid>88840013</ecuid>
<make>Mitsubishi</make>
<market>EDM</market>
<model>Lancer</model>
<submodel>EVO9</submodel>
<transmission>Manual</transmission>
<year>2005</year>
<flashmethod>mitsukernelocp</flashmethod>
<memmodel>SH7055</memmodel>
</romid>

<include>88590013</include>

<table name="High Octane Fuel Map">
<table name="Engine Load" address="6fd0"/>
<table name="RPM" address="6fa8"/>
</table>

<table name="High Octane Ignition Map 2" address="54b1">
<table name="Engine Load" address="7034"/>
<table name="RPM" address="7002"/>
</table>

<table name="Low Octane Ignition Map 2" address="5661">
<table name="Engine Load"/>
<table name="RPM"/>
</table>

<table name="High Octane Ignition Map 3" address="59c1">
<table name="Engine Load"/>
<table name="RPM"/>
</table>

<table name="Low Octane Ignition Map 3" address="5b71">
<table name="Engine Load"/>
<table name="RPM"/>
</table>

<table name="Stationary Rev Limit" address="118e"/>

<table name="Open Loop Throttle Low Load">
<table name="RPM" address="72c6"/>
</table>

<table name="Open Loop Throttle High Load">
<table name="RPM" address="6fa8"/>
</table>

</rom>
Last edited by evo400 on Fri Jul 21, 2006 5:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
evo400
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 1:45 pm

ignition maps ???

Postby msoysal » Wed Jul 19, 2006 4:20 pm

thanks for the definition. But are the high and low ignition maps the same since you have written the address for both of them as 5661.
msoysal
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 1:35 pm
Location: ISTANBUL

Re: ignition maps ???

Postby evo400 » Fri Jul 21, 2006 5:26 am

msoysal wrote:thanks for the definition. But are the high and low ignition maps the same since you have written the address for both of them as 5661.


sorry 54b1 is the right addres
evo400
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 1:45 pm


Return to Mitsubishi (all models)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests