rewt wrote:Stock WRX intake: 60.0mm
BigMAF intake: 76.2mm (assuming BigMAF is 3 in.)
Where did you get those numbers?
Jeff Sponaugle at PDX reports different diameters in an article he wrote a few years ago. A copy is at
http://www.pdxtuning.com/technical_big_maf.htm. He said the WRX MAF tube has an inner diameter of 2.60 in. (66.04 mm) and a cross section area of 5.31 sq in (3425.8 sq mm), while the Big MAF tube has an inner diameter of 3.09 in (78.49 mm) and a cross section area of 7.5 sq in (4838.1 sq mm).
So that means the cross section area of the BigMAF is 41% (7.5/5.31=1.41) larger than the stock WRX tube and the additional air flow at a particular MAF voltage should also be roughly 41% higher for the BigMAF. Inversely, for a particular air flow, the BigMAF should result in a MAF voltage that is roughly 29% (5.31/7.5=0.71) lower.
Jeff confused himself about that last issue in his article. However, his data lead him to the correct conclusion:
First, the average reduction in measure flow from real flow is between 20 and 30%, not 41% as calculated.
Second, the additional correction is much less at lower flow then at higher flow. This explains the observations that an offset in injector size is not enough to correct for larger MAF setups.
I think you need to first re-scale the injectors using the stock MAF tube. Then, once that's been nailed down, re-scale the MAF voltage table for the BigMAF. I think it's impossible to try and do both at the same time.