Moderator: Freon
I'm not that far off from a release.. Things like this make me apprehensive of the whole thing. I think I will probably do binary only first and see what the reactions are before deciding on a license. Seeing as though there are quite a few people that seem to be writing at least a little code, we want to pick something which will give us all the least amount of headaches.bofh wrote:While looking at stuff today, I started to think about licensing. We already have some tools coming up, and a hardware schematic on the site. And no concept of what we want for a license. Now not everyone will want the same license for a submission. For example, Calvin's TARI software will only be free as in beer, but not GPL. Which is fine, and I will still use the tool... But, do we want to "encourage" people to GPL what goes here? Do we care? Because if we do, it will be easier to set a standard now, rather than later.
the beer was a joke i dont expect any reward for my contribution other than to build a user base for it.Calvin's TARI software will only be free as in beer, but not GPL.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests