Hello !
Does ecuflash have planned any future ecu tuning ?
Moderator: Freon
radsdau wrote:Hardly surprising really; he has put in years of work developing this on and off for what is probably very little return.
From me personally, I'm grateful to Colby for what he has bought to the world through this website and ECUFlash/OP2. Colby- you da man.
radsdau wrote:Hardly surprising really; he has put in years of work developing this on and off for what is probably very little return.
From me personally, I'm grateful to Colby for what he has bought to the world through this website and ECUFlash/OP2. Colby- you da man.
Wiretap wrote:Open source development would be what would be responsible for ensuring that ECUFlash continued to progress and offer support for more and more cars.
Open source development is what this project needs.
Wiretap wrote:Why do you think Linux has been so successful?
radsdau wrote:Wiretap wrote:Open source development would be what would be responsible for ensuring that ECUFlash continued to progress and offer support for more and more cars.
Open source development is what this project needs.
Yes it would make that more likely. However Colby really is under no obligation to make it OS.Wiretap wrote:Why do you think Linux has been so successful?
Nearly as successful as Windows and OSX right?
radsdau wrote:Hardly surprising really; he has put in years of work developing this on and off for what is probably very little return.
From me personally, I'm grateful to Colby for what he has bought to the world through this website and ECUFlash/OP2. Colby- you da man.
radsdau wrote:Wiretap wrote:Open source development would be what would be responsible for ensuring that ECUFlash continued to progress and offer support for more and more cars.
Open source development is what this project needs.
Yes it would make that more likely. However Colby really is under no obligation to make it OS.
Colby Boles wrote:THE PROPOSAL
What I'm proposing is coming up with an open platform for modifying code and data on the stock Subaru ECU much as the ECUTEK and Cobb commercial solutions do. The "platform" would consist of low cost hardware (say $100 for a USB version) which interfaces to the ODBII port and free, open source software running on a PC (and perhaps ported to other platforms). Some of the features I'm envisioning are:
radsdau wrote:Wiretap wrote:Why do you think Linux has been so successful?
Nearly as successful as Windows and OSX right?
radsdau wrote:@merp: What I was meaning was that a project doesn't have to be OS to be successful.
I agree that ECUFlash is probably going to go nowhere while it remains closed. I too would like to see it opened up in a similar fashion to ROMRaider. I'm sure Colby would like to continue to sell his OP2 cables though. May as well have some passive incoming going on.
Sasha_A80 wrote:What problem is that ecuFlash is not OS project ? You may still use this for free.
You may participate in RR and\or freeSSM development for edit\logging. You may still buy\use\develop a hardware for ecu flashing.
The problem is that not too many people really help in (OS) development.
Having almost no help in code\harware development Colby had decided to not open the code. We could not blame him for his decision.
Merp wrote:If the project were open, I have no doubts that at this point we would already have an integrated Edit/Log/RAMTune/Flash program, complete with OP2.0 standalone logging integration, data aggregation, and analysis tools.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests